Progress Made on Nuclear Material Security, But Job Is Not Complete
This month marks the one-year anniversary of the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC. That historic event gathered leaders from 47 nations to address one of the world’s greatest threats. Now, one year out, we can point to a number of concrete ways weapons-usable material has been better secured (or even eliminated) to keep it from falling into the hands of terrorists.
First, there has been a reduction in the number of locations where nuclear material is stored, a reduction in the overall amount of material, and increased security for vulnerable sites. In almost every case, this progress was the result of a broader multilateral process and required cooperation among multiple countries to accomplish. For example:
Second, there has also been international action to counter the illicit smuggling of weapons-usable nuclear material. Examples include:
And finally, we have seen new efforts to improve nuclear security through increased funding or training, including:
For a more thorough assessment of fulfillment of the commitments made at the 2010 summit as well as recommendations for governments looking toward the next event, two members of the Fissile Materials Working Group (FMWG)—Arms Control Association and Partnership for Global Security—have just issued a new report.
While these accomplishments are significant, much more work is still needed to meet the 2010 summit participants’ agreed-upon goal of securing all vulnerable nuclear material by the end of 2013. As another Nuclear Security Summit, set for 2012 in South Korea, approaches, political leaders must continue to focus on this highly important task.
In the newest issue of Courier, we share an amazing (and secret) diplomatic effort to secure dangerous nuclear material in Kazakhstan. Two ambassadors discuss how to make our world safer from nuclear terrorism. You can also discover more than you ever wanted to know about climate change negotiations and about the tension within the United Nations that makes it difficult to be efficient. Our final piece looks at the potential for mass atrocities in the Dominican Republic.
Ahead of the third Nuclear Security Summit, the Stanley Foundation produced a 13-minute video looking at what needs to be done to stop terrorist groups from acquiring enough fissile material to make a bomb. The foundation talked with over a dozen diverse and distinguished experts from the Nuclear Security Governance Experts Group and the Fissile Materials Working Group to see how today's patchwork of voluntary arrangements can be forged into a long-lasting system. Watch the video.
Our bimonthly newsletter highlights new resources for knowing more about preventing nuclear terrorism as well as stopping mass atrocities before they start. We also take a look at how the shifting clout between emerging and established powers poses one of the most complex challenges of our time.
In the latest, you’ll also find many extras—from upcoming events to multimedia resources. Sign up now
This Now Showing event-in-a-box toolkit Before the Killing Begins: The Politics of Mass Violence considers how early preventive strategies by governments and the international community should build much-needed capacities within countries, and make it harder for leaders to resort to violence. It aims to encourage discussion of how future efforts might better protect populations under threat, giving new resolve to the promise of never again. Sign Up.
The Stanley Foundation publishes policy briefs, analytical articles, and reports on a number of international issues.
|Watch and Learn
Stanley Foundation events, talks, video reports, and segments from our Now Showing event-in-a-box series can now be viewed on YouTube. To receive regular updates on our video posts, please subscribe today.