The Stanley Foundation
Seeking a secure peace with freedom and justice, built on global citizenship and effective global governance.

Pressing Challenges. In the face of urgent development and security challenges, many countries will never view prevention of nuclear terrorism as a domestic priority. Pictured here, an infant takes a bath at a refugee camp in Bunia.
Pressing Challenges. In the face of urgent development and security challenges, many countries will never view prevention of nuclear terrorism as a domestic priority. Pictured here, an infant takes a bath at a refugee camp in Bunia.
(Photo by The Stanley Foundation/Kristin McHugh)
Nuclear Security
Curbing Proliferation Through Development
Nuclear terrorism is not a ­preeminent concern for most countries, but preventing it has benefits they should consider

Widening fears over catastrophic terrorism continue to stoke scrutiny of “nuclear capable” governments’ capacity to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Prevailing wisdom holds that proliferation and nuclear terrorism are manageable provided these governments exercise rigorous control over limited stockpiles of nuclear materials. It was this conviction that led President Obama to convene 47 world leaders in Washington for an unprecedented summit on nuclear security in April. Although the Nuclear Security Summit highlighted the enduring need for vigilance among committed governments, regrettably, the nature of the proliferation threat has evolved so dramatically that traditional methods of prevention are growing increasingly out of date.

Today’s proliferation challenges are perhaps best summarized by this disconcerting revelation: No longer do governments alone determine who gets the bomb. Globalization, privatization, and economics have empowered more actors—including private industry and individuals—in more countries with the capacity to facilitate nuclear weapons acquisition. Indeed, today’s notable proliferation challenges in North Korea and Iran are, in large part, stories of unscrupulous nonstate actors that have willingly developed, shared, funded, or shipped sensitive materials and technologies. They have done so while subverting governments’ preventive efforts, or while governments willingly neglect such efforts in pursuit of greater economic interests or competing security challenges.

Recognizing Regional Priorities
Convincing governments and a rapidly expanding array of private sector entities that proliferation is, in the words of the president, an “unprecedented threat” will be no easy task. Consider this:

  • Annually across Latin America, more than 100,000 people are killed by violent crimes often involving handguns linked to the growing trade in illicit drugs.
  • Each year in sub-Saharan Africa, around 1.4 million people die from AIDS while an additional 1.9 million new victims are infected with HIV.
  • In South Asia, as a result of malnutrition, 30 percent of infants born are dangerously underweight.

In the face of these development and security challenges, many governments will never view the threat of nuclear terrorism as a preeminent challenge to their security. Nor is it reasonable for us to expect them to. Yet many of these countries are becoming increasingly attractive acquisition points or shipping hubs for entities seeking the bomb. And there are powerful financial incentives for any government or private sector company to look the other way in the face of lucrative trade in sensitive goods and materials.

Two Birds, One Stone
In this environment, appealing to the enlightened self-interest of every link along the proliferation supply chain is critical to proliferation prevention. Fortunately, the assistance available to do so is inherently “dual-use.”

For instance, seeking to diversify their tourism economies in the 1990s, Caribbean countries invested in their port and transshipment facilities, capitalizing on their strategic location at America’s “third border” and at the end of the Panama Canal route. Following the September 11 attacks, US authorities demanded heightened security measures that most governments of the region could ill-afford, leaving them locked out of the global supply chain, their earlier investments for naught. As new streams of nonproliferation assistance became available, however, Caribbean governments saw an opportunity to marry those security goals with their domestic economic development and diversification plans. That assistance helped them comply with nonproliferation obligations, meet International Ship and Port Facility Security standards, and ensured their continued competitiveness in the global marketplace—all while promoting sustainable nonproliferation.

A similar dual-use dynamic is now unfolding in Central America. As governments of the region struggle with drug and small arms trafficking and the subsequent growth of violent gangs—all challenges of a higher priority than WMD proliferation—new nonproliferation assistance can help strengthen border security and cargo screening and promote the rule of law. Such measures would tighten the global nonproliferation regime while providing direct benefit to the beleaguered people of Central America.

In the Middle East, the dual-use “needs” are very different. Long-term economic planning and burgeoning energy requirements have led no fewer than 12 governments to begin exploring civilian nuclear power. Many have the financial resources to implement their plans, but most lack the human and technical capacity. Targeted technical assistance could go far to promote the safe, transparent development and operation of nuclear power generation, while simultaneously ensuring a sustainable and robust nonproliferation environment, thus bringing the region into a wider security dialogue.

In recent years, Africa has become a growing international security priority. Weak and failing states have proven themselves to be hotbeds for terrorist recruitment, and governments’ inability to effectively police their borders has raised concerns over illicit transshipment. Moreover, longstanding and acute health problems have challenged African governments’ ability to implement newly promulgated international health regulations and provide reasonable care for their people, thus ensuring an endless cycle of poverty and hopelessness. By identifying and marrying new streams of nonproliferation assistance to these endemic challenges, not only can we help to eliminate the growing trafficking trade in drugs, small arms, humans, and conflict resources that undermines governments and threatens people, we can inject innovative new assistance into regional public health infrastructure—all while achieving sustainable nuclear and biological nonproliferation.

As a follow up to the Nuclear Security Summit, President Obama will work to hold the 47 countries represented accountable for the promises they made. Just as importantly, he should think creatively regarding how to build sustainable nonproliferation efforts with the next generation of governments whose priorities are often (and rightfully) elsewhere, but whose exploitation by committed terrorists could significantly undermine the president’s nonproliferation agenda.




— Brian Finlay, senior associate of the Henry L. Stimson Center and director of the Managing Across Boundaries Program
Share: Email Facebook Twitter
Reporting a Radiation Emergency Reporting a Radiation Emergency
Journalists would play an indispensable role keeping the public informed in an emergency resulting in the release of radiation, either accidental or deliberate. But what do they need to do their job effectively? The following recommendations to authorities who would manage such an emergency were drafted by participants in the 2016 Rotterdam Nuclear Security Workshop for International Journalists.

Courier Courier
The latest issue of Courier  features articles on the state of securing nuclear material as the final nuclear security summit approaches in early April. It also includes a special reprint of an article from the Center for Public Intregrity, "The Stalking Threat of Nuclear Terrorism." Alex Bellamy, an expert on R2P, discusses the progress made in "Acting on the Responsibility to Protect," and three students from a global scholars conference comment about climate change. Lastly, a brief look at the foundation's Iowa Student Global Leadership conference. The full Spring 2016 issue. PDF (2.0 MB) Subscribe for FREE.

Employment Opportunities
Assistant to the President/CEO: This full-time position performs a variety of administrative functions for the president/CEO and serves as a liaison to foundation governance members.

Operations Administrative SpecialistThis full-time position involves administrative support for the operations department at the Stanley Foundation.

Communications Specialist: The Stanley Foundation seeks an experienced communications specialist to join its Communications Department.

Policy Program Associate, Nuclear Security: The Stanley Foundation seeks a program associate to join its Policy Programming Department. 

Launching Global Climate Actions
The world recently looked to Paris for the most important global climate change negotiations for achieving a safer climate world: the 21st meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). As a helpful reference we have compiled this summary of the major work of the Stanley Foundation and its collaborators in an active global role during the past year preparing for this historic event…and the important continuing work ahead. More.

the latest the latest
Our bimonthly newsletter is filled with resources to keep you up to date with our work at the Stanley Foundation. Each edition includes news about recent publications and stories as well as features our people and partners.

You will also find many extras, from upcoming events to multimedia resources. Sign up for the latest to stay engaged on key global issues.

Stanley Foundation Annual Conferences Stanley Foundation Annual Conferences
The Stanley Foundation holds two annual conferences, UN Issues and the Strategy for Peace Conference. These bring together experts from the public and private sectors to meet in a distraction-free setting and candidly exchange ideas on pressing foreign policy challenges.

Divided into roundtable talks, the cutting-edge discussions are intended to inspire group consensus and shared recommendations to push forward the debate on the foundation’s key policy areas.

Receive Materials Receive Materials
The Stanley Foundation publishes policy briefs, analytical articles, and reports on a number of international issues. To reduce our carbon footprint and cut waste, we almost exclusively, use electronic distribution for our publications. Sign up to receive our resources via e-mail.

Nuclear Security Video Nuclear Security Video
The Stanley Foundation produced a 13-minute video looking at what needs to be done to stop terrorist groups from acquiring enough fissile material to make a bomb. The foundation talked with over a dozen diverse and distinguished experts from the Nuclear Security Governance Experts Group and the Fissile Materials Working Group to see how today's patchwork of voluntary arrangements can be forged into a long-lasting system. Watch the video.

Watch and Learn Watch and Learn
Stanley Foundation events, talks, video reports, and segments from our Now Showing event-in-a-box series can now be viewed on YouTube. To receive regular updates on our video posts, please subscribe today.