Strengthening Nuclear Security in a Post-Summit World
The decades-long effort to minimize the risk of nuclear terrorism is at a critical crossroads.
This spring, the United States hosted the fourth and final Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC. Senior representatives of more than 50 nations convened to mark the end of an unprecedented international initiative over the last six years to strengthen security measures aimed at preventing nuclear terrorism. During that time, many states made significant progress, but more work is needed.
Governments must continue their efforts to ensure that all stocks of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and plutonium—the key ingredients for nuclear weapons—are effectively and sustainably protected, everywhere they exist, against threats that terrorists and thieves could realistically pose.
Build Upon National Security Commitments
National commitments to improve nuclear security, offered as “house gifts” at each of the nuclear security summits, were important devices for making and marking ongoing progress. Now that the summits have ended, states should continue to build on these commitments. The newly formed nuclear security contact group can play a useful role by serving as a place where like-minded states can develop more-stringent security principles and guidelines that they pledge to apply to all stocks of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons-usable materials, and invite other states to sign on.
Consolidated Storage Sites
But principles and pledges only matter if they result in increased security on the ground. Governments should focus on addressing the dangers that create the highest risks, such as insider threats, facilities that handle fissile materials in bulk, and cyber threats. Reducing the number of sites where HEU and plutonium are stored can help on all of these fronts. All countries should develop national-level plans for accomplishing their military and civilian nuclear objectives within the smallest practicable number of locations.
Strengthen Security Culture
Within organizations responsible for nuclear weapons or materials, effective and sustainable nuclear security depends on establishing not only strong security rules and policies but also healthy security habits and practices. An organizational culture that prioritizes security will discourage complacency about threats and vulnerabilities. Every country with weapons-usable nuclear materials should have a program to assess and strengthen nuclear security culture, and managers and appropriate staff should receive briefings on existing or emerging threats.
As part of a cooperative international action to increase nuclear security, storage containers of highly enriched uranium are shipped under protected transport from Hungary to Russia in 2013. (NNSA)
Expand International Cooperation
New international cooperation on nuclear security is essential, particularly now that there are no plans for more high-level summits. The United States should expand its nuclear security cooperation with India, Pakistan, and China, in particular, sharing knowledge about nuclear security arrangements and consulting on regulatory and technical steps that might strengthen security for all concerned.
Despite ongoing tension between the two countries, the United States and Russia must find a way to rebuild the nuclear security cooperation that has been a foundational component of their relationship for more than two decades. If they were able to work together on issues of mutual interest during the Cold War, surely they can do so now to reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism. The United States and Russia should agree to a set of cooperative activities that includes nuclear security, but also related areas that are in both countries’ interests, such as scientific exchanges on nuclear energy development.
The Obama-led era of summits has ended, but the need for urgent action has not. States must now recommit themselves to continuous improvement of nuclear security within their boarders and find ways to work together effectively toward that end. This work will not be easy, yet it is the only way to ensure that nuclear weapons and the materials used to make them remain out of the hands of terrorists.
Martin B. Malin is executive director of the Project on Managing the Atom at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Nickolas Roth is a research associate at the Project on Managing the Atom.
Parts of this article draw from the authors’ 2016 report with Matthew Bunn and William H. Tobey titled “Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Continuous Improvement or Dangerous Decline?” published by the Project on Managing the Atom.
— Commentary by Martin B. Malin and Nickolas Roth
The Winter 2016 issue of Courier features policy insights for the President-elect and new US leadership to improve our peace and security in nuclear policy, genocide prevention, and climate change. The issue also includes an in-depth interview with a survivor of the Phnom Penh, Cambodia genocide in the late 1970s. The full Winter 2016 issue. PDF (1.0 MB) Subscribe for FREE.
|Stanley Foundation at 60
On December 12, 1956, the Stanley Foundation was certified as a nonprofit corporation in the state of Iowa, bringing to life an organization dedicated to creating a world in which there is a secure peace with freedom and justice. Sixty years later, the organization continues to pursue and advance that vision as a thriving nonpartisan operating foundation. Moreover, it remains an organization with a professional staff and the involvement of family members who have an ongoing role in shaping its strategy and core values. More.
|IRP Fellows Reporting Live from the COP22 Climate Change Conference in Morocco
The International Reporting Project (IRP) and the Stanley Foundation collaborated to bring five international journalists to Marrakech, Morocco to report on the Twenty-Second Conference of the Parties (COP22) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) from November 7-18, 2016.
|SAFETY Guidelines for Journalists:
In the event of a radiation incident such as the use of a so-called dirty bomb or nuclear reactor incident, accurate and swift reporting is vital to public safety. This guide is intended to both help the journalist to be safe if they are covering such a story and to provide basic safety information that can be conveyed to the public to limit the risk of radiation exposure.
|Reporting a Radiation Emergency
Journalists would play an indispensable role keeping the public informed in an emergency resulting in the release of radiation, either accidental or deliberate. But what do they need to do their job effectively? The following recommendations to authorities who would manage such an emergency were drafted by participants in the 2016 Rotterdam Nuclear Security Workshop for International Journalists.
Our bimonthly newsletter is filled with resources to keep you up to date with our work at the Stanley Foundation. Each edition includes news about recent publications and stories as well as features our people and partners.
You will also find many extras, from upcoming events to multimedia resources. Sign up for the latest to stay engaged on key global issues.
|Stanley Foundation Annual Conferences
The Stanley Foundation holds two annual conferences, UN Issues and the Strategy for Peace Conference. These bring together experts from the public and private sectors to meet in a distraction-free setting and candidly exchange ideas on pressing foreign policy challenges.
Divided into roundtable talks, the cutting-edge discussions are intended to inspire group consensus and shared recommendations to push forward the debate on the foundation’s key policy areas.
The Stanley Foundation publishes policy briefs, analytical articles, and reports on a number of international issues. To reduce our carbon footprint and cut waste, we almost exclusively, use electronic distribution for our publications. Sign up to receive our resources via e-mail.
|Nuclear Security Video
The Stanley Foundation produced a 13-minute video looking at what needs to be done to stop terrorist groups from acquiring enough fissile material to make a bomb. The foundation talked with over a dozen diverse and distinguished experts from the Nuclear Security Governance Experts Group and the Fissile Materials Working Group to see how today's patchwork of voluntary arrangements can be forged into a long-lasting system. Watch the video.
|Watch and Learn
Stanley Foundation events, talks, video reports, and segments from our Now Showing event-in-a-box series can now be viewed on YouTube. To receive regular updates on our video posts, please subscribe today.