The Stanley Foundation
Seeking a secure peace with freedom and justice, built on global citizenship and effective global governance.
Leaders Must Effectively Use Various Global Venues

Keith Porter
Des Moines Register
September 2009

In the space of just two days this week, President Barack Obama will be center stage at three of the highest level venues in the world. On Wednesday he addresses the opening of the United Nations General Assembly. On Thursday he chairs a special session of the United Nations Security Council. And then he immediately jets off to Pittsburgh to host the G-20 summit of the world's largest economies.

This whirlwind tour through the global power structure is a good moment to reflect on the role and relevancy of these institutions in the 21st century. These three groups represent three quite different approaches to running global affairs - each with its own advantages as well as challenges.

The U.N, General Assembly was established in the aftermath of World War II to give every nation in the world a voice on the global stage. All of the current 192 member-states have an equal vote. Having the representatives of the whole world, especially at the head-of-state level, gathered in a single room is an impressive sight. But it is also an unwieldy body that rarely manages to reach meaningful agreements.

The U.N. Security Council arose from the same global charter as the General Assembly, but it functions quite differently. There are only 15 members. Ten of them rotate on two-year terms, but the other five (China, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States) are permanent members, each with the power to veto any council action. The council has the right to, among other things, authorize military action against threats to security anywhere in the world.

The council's powers under international law give it formidable legal and political authority, but the permanent members' veto makes it difficult for the group to take action. And even when it does move, serious questions are raised about its legitimacy because the five permanent members no longer represent the power realities of today's world. Decades of repeated reform attempts have been unable to make room for rising powers like Japan, India, Brazil, and others.

In still another vein are the global summits of the G-8 and G-20. Heads of states gather for these sessions once or twice a year (an exhausting three times in 2009) for photo opportunities and brief talks which are supposed to - at their best - shine a top level spotlight on crucial issues. On the plus side, these gatherings include a broader set of powerful nations without being too large to prevent meaningful conversation. But without the backing of something like the U.N. Charter, their decisions carry little standing in international law.

In different ways, the General Assembly, Security Council, and G-summits provide highly useful instruments to take action when the assembled countries really want to do something. Too often, however, world leaders use these bodies to issue well-meaning, high-minded statements of concern or vague pledges of initiative. As a colleague often says, the United Nations works best when nations actually unite. But these organizations cannot on their own force leaders to take action for the global common good.

Just as with domestic politics, political will is quite often a response to public pressure. We can build all the grand meeting halls and summit tables we want - and even rearrange them from time to time. But for world leaders to use these tools, they need to really feel the public's demand for cooperation and effective solutions.

All of us, then, should raise our expectations of these leaders, remind them of their responsibilities, and hold them accountable for the commitments they make.

Keith Porter is director of policy and outreach at The Stanley Foundation.
Share: Email Facebook Twitter
Receive Materials Receive Materials
The Stanley Foundation publishes policy briefs, analytical articles, and reports on a number of international issues. To reduce our carbon footprint and cut waste, we almost exclusively, use electronic distribution for our publications. Sign up to receive our resources via e-mail.

Employment Opportunities
Policy Program Associate, Nuclear Policy
The Stanley Foundation seeks a program associate to join its Policy Programming Department to contribute energy, creativity, and analytical skill to the design and implementation of programming on technology and nuclear policy. 

Operations Specialist
Seeking a dedicated, dynamic individual who has a passion for working in the field of event planning and prefers a small-business atmosphere with opportunities for international travel. This full-time position involves event-planning operations and activities for various programming efforts on climate change, nuclear policy issues, and mass violence and atrocities.

Courier Courier
The Spring 2018 issue of Courier highlights the issues facing Cambodian fishermen as their lakes are affected by climate change. It includes a tribute to Dick and Mary Jo Stanley, a look at UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ attempts at UN reform, and a peek at our Iowa Student Global Leadership conference.

The issue also focuses on how artificial intelligence is being integrated into military systems around the world, how sustainable farming practices can impact carbon emissions, and the cyber vulnerabilities of the world’s most dangerous weapons. Spring 2018 PDF. (1,151K) Subscribe for FREE.

the latest the latest
Our bimonthly newsletter is filled with resources to keep you up to date with our work at the Stanley Foundation. Each edition includes news about recent publications and stories as well as features our people and partners.

You will also find many extras, from upcoming events to multimedia resources. 

Sign up for the latest to stay engaged on key global issues.

Stanley Foundation Annual Conferences Stanley Foundation Annual Conferences
The Stanley Foundation holds two annual conferences, UN Issues and the Strategy for Peace Conference. These bring together experts from the public and private sectors to meet in a distraction-free setting and candidly exchange ideas on pressing foreign policy challenges.

Divided into roundtable talks, the cutting-edge discussions are intended to inspire group consensus and shared recommendations to push forward the debate on the foundation’s key policy areas.

The Stanley Foundation: Part of COP23 The Stanley Foundation: Part of COP23
As a part of our efforts to limit global warming to 1.5° C, the foundation put forward policy ideas to achieve a global turning point in emissions by 2020, built upon efforts to catalyze global climate action by countries and sub- and non-state actors, and worked with journalists to strengthen coverage of the UN climate negotiations.

A Climate for Conflict: Stories from Somalia A Climate for Conflict: Stories from Somalia
The Ground Truth Project, New America, and the Stanley Foundation are hosting a Screening of “A Climate for Conflict” and discussion with the creators followed by a panel discussion on Climate Security and Societal Resilience on May 30, 2017.

Somalia today is at a crossroads between a deepening crisis and a path to stability. Photographer and filmmaker Nichole Sobecki and writer Laura Heaton spent 18 months documenting personal stories of Somalia, creating a film, photography, and reporting that vividly illustrate the human consequences and security risks of a changing climate. Read more.

Follow the conversation online with #AClimateforConflict.

Watch and Learn Watch and Learn
Stanley Foundation events, talks, video reports, and segments from our Now Showing event-in-a-box series can now be viewed on YouTube. To receive regular updates on our video posts, please subscribe today.